Ergebnisse 1-3 von 13
This does not mean that private morality is not important , or that the history of
morals is not a legitimate part of history . But the historian does not turn aside to
pronounce moral judgments on the private lives of individuals who appear in his
moral judgments on individuals can be just as misleading and mischievous as
the moral denunciation of individuals . Recognition that some individual slave -
owners were high - minded was constantly used as an excuse for not
But does not the fact that the historian , unlike the scientist , becomes involved by
the nature of his material in these issues of moral judgment imply the submission
of history to a superhistorical standard of value ? I do not think that it does .
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Bewertungen von Nutzern
LibraryThing ReviewNutzerbericht - antiquary - LibraryThing
It puzzles me that Carr was taken so seriously as a "distinguished historian" in British academic circles, considering that he spent the first part of his career championing appeasement of Germany and much of the rest admiring Stalin. Vollständige Rezension lesen
LibraryThing ReviewNutzerbericht - JonArnold - LibraryThing
Going back to re-read old university textbooks for fun must be a sign of incipient nostalgia for the lost days of youth. That or masochism. I didn’t get a nostalgic buzz (possibly as I was young and ... Vollständige Rezension lesen
Notes towards a Second
The Historian and His Facts
3 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
From Nursery Rhymes to Nationhood: Children's Literature and the ...
Elizabeth A. Galway
Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2008