Ergebnisse 1-3 von 16
This does not mean that private morality is not important , or that the history of
morals is not a legitimate part of history . But the historian does not turn aside to
pronounce moral judgments on the private lives of individuals who appear in his
And if anyone cavils at the statement that it is not our business to pass moral
judgment on Hitler or Stalin — or , if on Senator McCarthy this is because they
were the contemporaries of many of us , because hundreds of thousands of those
But does not the fact that the historian , unlike the scientist , becomes involved by
the nature of his material in these issues of moral judgment imply the submission
of history to a superhistorical standard of value ? I do not think that it does .
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Bewertungen von Nutzern
LibraryThing ReviewNutzerbericht - antiquary - LibraryThing
It puzzles me that Carr was taken so seriously as a "distinguished historian" in British academic circles, considering that he spent the first part of his career championing appeasement of Germany and much of the rest admiring Stalin. Vollständige Rezension lesen
LibraryThing ReviewNutzerbericht - JonArnold - LibraryThing
Going back to re-read old university textbooks for fun must be a sign of incipient nostalgia for the lost days of youth. That or masochism. I didn’t get a nostalgic buzz (possibly as I was young and ... Vollständige Rezension lesen
LECTURE PAGE I THE HISTORIAN AND His FACTS I
SOCIETY AND THE INDIVIDUAL
HISTORY SCIENCE AND MORALITY
4 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
What Is History?: The George Macaulay Trevelyan Lectures Delivered in the ...
E. H. Carr
Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2018