Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 70
Seite 694
vowels . F mentions that lexical marking would work , but would seriously complicate the description ; in fact , Schane ... unstressed vowels undergo diphthongization and vowel fronting instead of pretonic adjustment ( e.g. tiédeur ) .
vowels . F mentions that lexical marking would work , but would seriously complicate the description ; in fact , Schane ... unstressed vowels undergo diphthongization and vowel fronting instead of pretonic adjustment ( e.g. tiédeur ) .
Seite 695
vowels . F mentions that lexical marking would work , but would seriously complicate the description ; in fact , Schane ... unstressed vowels undergo diphthongization and vowel fronting instead of pretonic adjustment ( e.g. tiédeur ) .
vowels . F mentions that lexical marking would work , but would seriously complicate the description ; in fact , Schane ... unstressed vowels undergo diphthongization and vowel fronting instead of pretonic adjustment ( e.g. tiédeur ) .
Seite 848
strong evidence for extending the ( STRICTURE ) scale to vowels . One possibility is simply to extend the scale by four steps representing the different values of vowel height . But Lindau ( following Ladefoged 1967 ) points out that ...
strong evidence for extending the ( STRICTURE ) scale to vowels . One possibility is simply to extend the scale by four steps representing the different values of vowel height . But Lindau ( following Ladefoged 1967 ) points out that ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Language change and poetic options D Gary Miller | 21 |
Where does Latin sum come from? Martti A Nyman | 39 |
Referentiality in Spanish noun phrases Nelson Rojas | 61 |
Urheberrecht | |
29 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appears apply argues arguments associated assume assumption believe called Chapter claim classifier clause clear complementizer complex concerned consider constituents constraints constructions contains definite deletion derived determine discussion distinction English evidence example existence explanation expression fact FIGURE final function give given grammar historical important indicative initial interesting interpretation involved John kind language least lexical linguistic Mary meaning natural notion noun object occur particular passive phonological phrases position possible predict present Press principle probability problem proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relative respect result rules seems semantic sense sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface syntactic syntax theory tion transformations underlying University verbs vowels York