Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 78
Seite 119
Thus one environment in which various root transformations can apply , but not Subject Replacement , is in non - restrictive relative clauses , as shown by the contrast between 44 ( from Hooper & Thompson ) and 45.
Thus one environment in which various root transformations can apply , but not Subject Replacement , is in non - restrictive relative clauses , as shown by the contrast between 44 ( from Hooper & Thompson ) and 45.
Seite 122
The fronting transformations which cannot apply to the same sentences are now characterized as rules which move a phrase into COMP ( following the proposal by Bresnan ) . Furthermore , this analysis retains the earlier assumption that ...
The fronting transformations which cannot apply to the same sentences are now characterized as rules which move a phrase into COMP ( following the proposal by Bresnan ) . Furthermore , this analysis retains the earlier assumption that ...
Seite 893
Readers of LangUAGE would no doubt be disappointed if our theory lacked transformations . Indeed , it seems to be necessary to define a highly constrained class of rules which map structural descriptions into other structural ...
Readers of LangUAGE would no doubt be disappointed if our theory lacked transformations . Indeed , it seems to be necessary to define a highly constrained class of rules which map structural descriptions into other structural ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Language change and poetic options D Gary Miller | 21 |
Where does Latin sum come from? Martti A Nyman | 39 |
Referentiality in Spanish noun phrases Nelson Rojas | 61 |
Urheberrecht | |
29 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appears apply argues arguments associated assume assumption believe called Chapter claim classifier clause clear complementizer complex concerned consider constituents constraints constructions contains definite deletion derived determine discussion distinction English evidence example existence explanation expression fact FIGURE final function give given grammar historical important indicative initial interesting interpretation involved John kind language least lexical linguistic Mary meaning natural notion noun object occur particular passive phonological phrases position possible predict present Press principle probability problem proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relative respect result rules seems semantic sense sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface syntactic syntax theory tion transformations underlying University verbs vowels York