Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 79
Seite 17
given above , lup and words like it no longer had on the surface the following i originally responsible for Palatalization . Now if rule loss is truly a mechanism of phonological change , there is no formal reason , within standard ...
given above , lup and words like it no longer had on the surface the following i originally responsible for Palatalization . Now if rule loss is truly a mechanism of phonological change , there is no formal reason , within standard ...
Seite 18
A rule A → B / C - D is opaque to the extent that there are surface representations of the form ( i ) A in environment C_D or ( ii ) B in environment other than C - D. In the redundancy loss discussed above , we have rule opacity by ...
A rule A → B / C - D is opaque to the extent that there are surface representations of the form ( i ) A in environment C_D or ( ii ) B in environment other than C - D. In the redundancy loss discussed above , we have rule opacity by ...
Seite 808
NOM ACC ACC Considering the surface case canon of 60 as an output condition , we can now characterize the ungrammaticalness of 57b and 59b in terms of it ; i.e. , these sentences have the unpermitted types of case distribution shown in ...
NOM ACC ACC Considering the surface case canon of 60 as an output condition , we can now characterize the ungrammaticalness of 57b and 59b in terms of it ; i.e. , these sentences have the unpermitted types of case distribution shown in ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Language change and poetic options D Gary Miller | 21 |
Where does Latin sum come from? Martti A Nyman | 39 |
Referentiality in Spanish noun phrases Nelson Rojas | 61 |
Urheberrecht | |
29 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appears apply argues arguments associated assume assumption believe called Chapter claim classifier clause clear complementizer complex concerned consider constituents constraints constructions contains definite deletion derived determine discussion distinction English evidence example existence explanation expression fact FIGURE final function give given grammar historical important indicative initial interesting interpretation involved John kind language least lexical linguistic Mary meaning natural notion noun object occur particular passive phonological phrases position possible predict present Press principle probability problem proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relative respect result rules seems semantic sense sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface syntactic syntax theory tion transformations underlying University verbs vowels York