Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 33
Seite 333
which the second element of the fi ... fi compound complementizer is deleted ( Washabaugh 1975 ) , is not included in this analysis : ( 5 ) iz noweir fi mieri plant soka “ There isn't anywhere for Mary to plant suckers .
which the second element of the fi ... fi compound complementizer is deleted ( Washabaugh 1975 ) , is not included in this analysis : ( 5 ) iz noweir fi mieri plant soka “ There isn't anywhere for Mary to plant suckers .
Seite 344
Second , greater proximity of the embedded S to the dominating verb will tend to render the complementizer redundant . Again , Bolinger ( p . 38 ) finds that the proximity of that to the verb conditions the deletion of that .
Second , greater proximity of the embedded S to the dominating verb will tend to render the complementizer redundant . Again , Bolinger ( p . 38 ) finds that the proximity of that to the verb conditions the deletion of that .
Seite 345
In the same way , the lexical constraints on fi - tu variation do not wield a single favoring or inhibiting force over the form of the complementizer , but operate as multi - force constraints . The favoring power of a particular verb ...
In the same way , the lexical constraints on fi - tu variation do not wield a single favoring or inhibiting force over the form of the complementizer , but operate as multi - force constraints . The favoring power of a particular verb ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Language change and poetic options D Gary Miller | 21 |
Where does Latin sum come from? Martti A Nyman | 39 |
Referentiality in Spanish noun phrases Nelson Rojas | 61 |
Urheberrecht | |
29 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appears apply argues arguments associated assume assumption believe called Chapter claim classifier clause clear complementizer complex concerned consider constituents constraints constructions contains definite deletion derived determine discussion distinction English evidence example existence explanation expression fact FIGURE final function give given grammar historical important indicative initial interesting interpretation involved John kind language least lexical linguistic Mary meaning natural notion noun object occur particular passive phonological phrases position possible predict present Press principle probability problem proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relative respect result rules seems semantic sense sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface syntactic syntax theory tion transformations underlying University verbs vowels York