Barth and Schleiermacher on the Doctrine of Election: A Systematic-Theological Comparison

Cover
OUP Oxford, 04.01.2007 - 240 Seiten
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth. Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a remarkable resemblance to the position of Schleiermacher. He challenges the conventional wisdom that these two positions - or `liberal theology' and `dialectical theology' - stand in irreconcilable opposition. Barth articulates a fresh assessment of the doctrine not only in Church Dogmatics II/2, but in the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans and in his first series of lectures on Systematic Theology, the so-called Göttingen Dogmatics. Hence, a resemblance between Schleiermacher and Barth is already discernible in Barth's early theology - at a time when he was writing his most virulent criticisms of Schleiermacher.
 

Inhalt

Quite closeexcuse meto Schleiermacher
1
Schleiermachers Revision of the Doctrine in his Essay on Election
16
The Doctrine of Election in The Christian Faith
37
Barths Revision of the Doctrine of Election in his Commentary on Romans
104
The Doctrine of Election in the Göttingen Dogmatics
134
5 Barths Christological Revolution
158
Barth and Schleiermacher on Election A Challenge for TwentyFirstCentury Theology
198
Bibliography
212
Name Index
223
Subject Index
226
Urheberrecht

Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen

Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen

Autoren-Profil (2007)

Matthias Gockel is assistant pastor in a congregation near Wittenberg, Germany.

Bibliografische Informationen