Language, Band 52,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1976 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 80
Seite 541
... John saw Harry and John saw Bill to John saw Harry and Bill , by changing a coördination of sentences into a coördination of phrases ; but I can see no reason to allow a change as drastic as this , which I shall call ' wholesale ...
... John saw Harry and John saw Bill to John saw Harry and Bill , by changing a coördination of sentences into a coördination of phrases ; but I can see no reason to allow a change as drastic as this , which I shall call ' wholesale ...
Seite 545
... John came and Bill came too , rather than the result of moving Bill out of John and Bill came . I have tried to show why I think this analysis is mistaken , but I think it is important that Harries has focussed attention on sentences ...
... John came and Bill came too , rather than the result of moving Bill out of John and Bill came . I have tried to show why I think this analysis is mistaken , but I think it is important that Harries has focussed attention on sentences ...
Seite 958
... John who is bad at it . ' ( 81 ) Atama wa John ga warui . head is - wrong ' As for the head , it is John who is weak . ' The derivation of these sentences must be as follows : ( 82 ) i . John NO nihongo ga heta desu . ii . John GA ...
... John who is bad at it . ' ( 81 ) Atama wa John ga warui . head is - wrong ' As for the head , it is John who is weak . ' The derivation of these sentences must be as follows : ( 82 ) i . John NO nihongo ga heta desu . ii . John GA ...
Inhalt
Conjunction Reduction Gapping and RightNode Raising Richard A Hudson | 535 |
The interface of theory and description Peter Cole | 563 |
Which that Herbert F W Stahlke | 584 |
Urheberrecht | |
15 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
abstract acceptable allow analysis appear apply argument assumed claim comparatives complement complete conjunct consider constituent constraint construction contains coördination correct deletion derivation dialects direct discussion embedded English evidence examples explain expression fact final formal function give given grammar identification important indicative intelligent involved John language linguistic Maria marked Mary meaning Michigan natural Note noun object occur original particular passive person phonological position possible preposition present Press problem pronoun proposal question raising reason reduction reference relative clauses relativization represented restricted result Review rule seems semantic sentences similar situation speakers specific speech structure subjunctive suggests surface syntactic syntax texts theory tion transformational underlying University verb York