Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 77
Seite 3
This argument comes from Dougherty 1969 , who uses it to justify the corresponding rule of English . Further evidence for the transformational syntactic nature of QP is available in French - all predeterminers that vary in form agree in ...
This argument comes from Dougherty 1969 , who uses it to justify the corresponding rule of English . Further evidence for the transformational syntactic nature of QP is available in French - all predeterminers that vary in form agree in ...
Seite 5
This argument comes from Dougherty 1969 , who uses it to justify the corresponding rule of English . Further evidence for the transformational syntactic nature of QP is available in French - all predeterminers that vary in form agree in ...
This argument comes from Dougherty 1969 , who uses it to justify the corresponding rule of English . Further evidence for the transformational syntactic nature of QP is available in French - all predeterminers that vary in form agree in ...
Seite 25
Here 17a is the focus construction corresponding to 15a , and 18a is the focus construction corresponding to 16a . In each case the focus nominal corresponds to the topic of the sentence that underlies the out - of - focus clause .
Here 17a is the focus construction corresponding to 15a , and 18a is the focus construction corresponding to 16a . In each case the focus nominal corresponds to the topic of the sentence that underlies the out - of - focus clause .
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
I | 1 |
Focus and relativization | 19 |
A structural principle of language and its implications | 47 |
Urheberrecht | |
27 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
adjectives alternation analysis appear apply assume becomes called Chapter clause comparative consider consistent consonant constraints constructions contains corresponding deep derived diagram dialects discussion elements English evidence examples fact FIGURE final focus formal forms Formula further given gives grammar important indicated initial interesting interpretation involved John language later lexical linguistic marked markers meaning morpheme morphological natural negative nominal noted noun object observed occur original past patterns person phonetic phonological position possible present Press principle problem pronoun proposed provides question reference relations relative representation represented require respectively result rule seems semantic sentence sequences similar SPC's speaker specific Stage stem stress structure suffix suggest surface syntactic Table tense theory tion transformational underlying University verb vowel