Language, Band 49,Ausgaben 1-2George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1973 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 84
Seite 39
... relations cannot be based on SURFACE structure . If the categorial relations of relative constructions to other constituents had to be accounted for at the surface - structure level , one would not be able to deal with the numerous well ...
... relations cannot be based on SURFACE structure . If the categorial relations of relative constructions to other constituents had to be accounted for at the surface - structure level , one would not be able to deal with the numerous well ...
Seite 382
... relations ; Osgood's CONGRUITY / INCONGRUITY theory ( Osgood & Tannenbaum 1955 ) , applied primarily to attitude change and semantic - feature interactions ( cf. Osgood , Suci , & Tannenbaum 1957 , ch . 5 ) ; and Festinger's CONSONANCE ...
... relations ; Osgood's CONGRUITY / INCONGRUITY theory ( Osgood & Tannenbaum 1955 ) , applied primarily to attitude change and semantic - feature interactions ( cf. Osgood , Suci , & Tannenbaum 1957 , ch . 5 ) ; and Festinger's CONSONANCE ...
Seite 391
... relations ] Sugar is sweet ( * and John isn't blond . [ opposed relations ] " but Sugar is sweet and John is charming [ shared relations ; similar M2s ] * but Sugar is sweet ' and vinegar is sour . [ shared relations ; opposed M1s and ...
... relations ] Sugar is sweet ( * and John isn't blond . [ opposed relations ] " but Sugar is sweet and John is charming [ shared relations ; similar M2s ] * but Sugar is sweet ' and vinegar is sour . [ shared relations ; opposed M1s and ...
Inhalt
nology | 67 |
The role of surface phonetic constraints in generative | 87 |
English pronouns | 121 |
Urheberrecht | |
11 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
adjectives alternative analysis appear apply assume becomes chapter claim clause comparative consider consistent consonant constituent constraints constructions contains corresponding deep derived dialects direction discussion distinction elements English evidence examples fact FIGURE final focus formal forms further given gives grammar important indicate initial interesting interpretation involved John kind language latter lexical linguistic marked markers meaning memory mutational natural negative nominal noted noun object occur original past patterns person phonetic phonological phrase position possible present Press principle problem pronoun proposed question reference relations relative representation represented require respectively result rule seems semantic sentence sequences similar simple speakers Stage stem stress structure suffix suggest surface syntactic Table tense theory tion transformational underlying University verb vowel