Negotiating Asylum: The Eu Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection
How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the foundational oppositions embedded in migration and asylum issues? This work combines the potential of legal formalism with an analytical framework drawing on political theory. It analyses the argumentative strategies used by international lawyers, and developed them further, exploiting the interpretative methodology of international law as well as elaborate discrimination arguments. The author concludes that deflecting protection seekers by means of visa requirements may constitute a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, and that the prescriptions of international law oblige Member States to apply the Dublin Convention and the Spanish Protocol in a manner emptying it of its main control functions. The author also shows that burden-sharing remains the pivotal element in the normative dynamics behind the EU acquis, and explains why the European Court of Human Rights must be regarded as the only transnational forum for the legitimate negotiation of asylum in Europe.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
and Justiciability Advantages
Determinants of Protection
UNIVERSALISM VERSUS PARTICULARISM
DETERMINANTS OF PROTECTION SYSTEMS
ACCESS TO TERRITORY UNDER THE EU ACQUIS
ACCESS TO FULLFLEDGED PROCEDURES UNDER
ACCESS TO PROTECTION UNDER THE EU ACQUIS
Is the EU acquis in Extraterritorial Protection 10 Interpreting Hard Cases
DELIMITING AND JUSTIFYING PROTECTION UNDER
THREE CONFLICT ZONES
INSTRUMENTS AND DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE
accordance acquis Action adopted agreement Amsterdam application approach argument Article asylum authorities binding border burden burden-sharing chapter claim Commission Committee competence concept conclusion considered contained Contracting Council Court decision determination domestic Draft Dublin Convention EC law ECHR effect entry established European Union existence extraterritorial protection further German given host human rights immigration implementation important individual interest international law interpretation issue Italy Joint latter limited means measures Member migration norms obligations offer particularist Parties persons policies political position practice present principle procedures prohibition Proposal protection seekers Protocol provisions question reasons receiving referred Refugee regard Regulation remains removal requirements Resolution responsibility risk rules safe Schengen scope sharing single situation sources specific status taken term territory theory third country Treaty UNHCR universalism universalist violation visa