Language, Band 53,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1977 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 75
Seite 611
... vowels will involve just some class of vowels that can be uniquely identified by specifying a single articulatory attribute . The null hypothesis , as previously stated ( §3.12 ) , is that all non - null sub - sets of the set of vowels ...
... vowels will involve just some class of vowels that can be uniquely identified by specifying a single articulatory attribute . The null hypothesis , as previously stated ( §3.12 ) , is that all non - null sub - sets of the set of vowels ...
Seite 694
... vowels undergo diphthongization and vowel fronting instead of pretonic adjustment ( e.g. tiédeur ) . F's perplexity reveals a lack of understanding which prevents him from seeing through Schane's analysis , and therefore minimizes his ...
... vowels undergo diphthongization and vowel fronting instead of pretonic adjustment ( e.g. tiédeur ) . F's perplexity reveals a lack of understanding which prevents him from seeing through Schane's analysis , and therefore minimizes his ...
Seite 848
... vowels . One possibility is simply to extend the scale by four steps representing the different values of vowel height . But Lindau ( following Ladefoged 1967 ) points out that the correct primary dimension corresponding to vowel height ...
... vowels . One possibility is simply to extend the scale by four steps representing the different values of vowel height . But Lindau ( following Ladefoged 1967 ) points out that the correct primary dimension corresponding to vowel height ...
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York