Language, Band 53,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1977 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 90
Seite 574
... theory . The proposal is illustrated by applying it to examples central to theorizing in generative grammar . Precisely formulated versions of claims made by Chomsky on the use of certain abbreviatory notations ( e.g. parentheses ) and ...
... theory . The proposal is illustrated by applying it to examples central to theorizing in generative grammar . Precisely formulated versions of claims made by Chomsky on the use of certain abbreviatory notations ( e.g. parentheses ) and ...
Seite 651
... theory . Chomsky 1955 is an example . Just as it was intended to be possible to take a set of rules and actually derive structures for sentences to be matched up with intuitions of native speakers , it was supposed to be possible to ...
... theory . Chomsky 1955 is an example . Just as it was intended to be possible to take a set of rules and actually derive structures for sentences to be matched up with intuitions of native speakers , it was supposed to be possible to ...
Seite 653
... theory of complement types . Foundations of Language 6.297-321 . 1972. Theory of complementation in English syntax . MIT dissertation . - . 1976a . On the form and functioning of transformations . Linguistic Inquiry 7.3-40 . 1976b . Non ...
... theory of complement types . Foundations of Language 6.297-321 . 1972. Theory of complementation in English syntax . MIT dissertation . - . 1976a . On the form and functioning of transformations . Linguistic Inquiry 7.3-40 . 1976b . Non ...
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York