Language, Band 53,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1977 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 35
Seite 602
... symbols on the right of the arrow ( compare the rule for S above ) ; of the three rules which together define another of the non- terminal categories , two will have one symbol and one will have two symbols ( compare the rules for ...
... symbols on the right of the arrow ( compare the rule for S above ) ; of the three rules which together define another of the non- terminal categories , two will have one symbol and one will have two symbols ( compare the rules for ...
Seite 616
... symbols . ) Next take the two rules which are three symbols long . We have already considered the probability of one or both of these being collapsible with the shorter rule ( i.e. the rule two symbols long ) , since the relation ' is ...
... symbols . ) Next take the two rules which are three symbols long . We have already considered the probability of one or both of these being collapsible with the shorter rule ( i.e. the rule two symbols long ) , since the relation ' is ...
Seite 617
... symbols , where each member of N is two symbols long , the probability that N contains no pair of strings exhibiting the rotary - type regularity is - Σ ( ) Σ ( :) ( 02 = 0 ) / 2 ) 2n - 1 1 = 0 n - n ( C3 ) Given an arbitrary set N of ...
... symbols , where each member of N is two symbols long , the probability that N contains no pair of strings exhibiting the rotary - type regularity is - Σ ( ) Σ ( :) ( 02 = 0 ) / 2 ) 2n - 1 1 = 0 n - n ( C3 ) Given an arbitrary set N of ...
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York