Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 58
Seite 526
The analysis proposed here does not allow for the creation of forms such as who or which in the derivation , since the underlying relativized NP is not of the same structure as corresponding NP's in RR's . 2.3 . SINGULAR COUNT NOUNS .
The analysis proposed here does not allow for the creation of forms such as who or which in the derivation , since the underlying relativized NP is not of the same structure as corresponding NP's in RR's . 2.3 . SINGULAR COUNT NOUNS .
Seite 672
The set of M - nouns is defined as containing those nouns in the language which cannot be divided into antonymy sets . ... From the semantic point of view , each noun in L designates a period of time which is of the same length as that ...
The set of M - nouns is defined as containing those nouns in the language which cannot be divided into antonymy sets . ... From the semantic point of view , each noun in L designates a period of time which is of the same length as that ...
Seite 810
ON THE CREATION AND USE OF ENGLISH COMPOUND NOUNS PAMELA DOWNING University of California , Berkeley A number of experimental tasks were conducted in which subjects were asked to interpret and create novel noun + noun compounds .
ON THE CREATION AND USE OF ENGLISH COMPOUND NOUNS PAMELA DOWNING University of California , Berkeley A number of experimental tasks were conducted in which subjects were asked to interpret and create novel noun + noun compounds .
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwighi Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from ? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important indicate interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels