Language, Band 53,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1977 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 33
Seite 750
... modals . It is remarkable that , in the very section where Jackendoff argues for the reality of the distinction between auxiliaries ( modals ) and verbs ( §3.13 ) , he is forced to admit in a parenthetical aside ( echoed by Lightfoot ...
... modals . It is remarkable that , in the very section where Jackendoff argues for the reality of the distinction between auxiliaries ( modals ) and verbs ( §3.13 ) , he is forced to admit in a parenthetical aside ( echoed by Lightfoot ...
Seite 758
... modals lack an agreement paradigm . Lack of person and number marking is there- fore no more reliable a criterion for modal status than any other of the properties that have been adduced . In the case of used and dare , the other semi ...
... modals lack an agreement paradigm . Lack of person and number marking is there- fore no more reliable a criterion for modal status than any other of the properties that have been adduced . In the case of used and dare , the other semi ...
Seite 759
George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch. the true modals would behave quite regularly . True modals would then be obliga- tory Hopping verbs , like be for Akmajian & Wasow . Moreover , there are true verbs which take zero tenseless ...
George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch. the true modals would behave quite regularly . True modals would then be obliga- tory Hopping verbs , like be for Akmajian & Wasow . Moreover , there are true verbs which take zero tenseless ...
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York