Language, Band 53,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1977 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 56
Seite 612
... involved can be uniquely identified by specifying a single articulatory attribute . Clearly , this generalization is close to the null hypothesis : there is not much differ- ence between 30 % and 0.341 - the figure arrived at in §3.32 ...
... involved can be uniquely identified by specifying a single articulatory attribute . Clearly , this generalization is close to the null hypothesis : there is not much differ- ence between 30 % and 0.341 - the figure arrived at in §3.32 ...
Seite 619
... INVOLVED BEING UNIQUELY IDENTIFIABLE BY A SINGLE ARTICULATORY ATTRIBUTE 0 3 PROBABILITY OF SAMPLE 0.00000 0.00000 4 0.00001 5 0.00004 6 0.00022 7 0.00102 8 0.00386 9 0.01201 10 0.03082 11 0.06537 : : . 17 0.07160 18 0.02785 19 0.00684 ...
... INVOLVED BEING UNIQUELY IDENTIFIABLE BY A SINGLE ARTICULATORY ATTRIBUTE 0 3 PROBABILITY OF SAMPLE 0.00000 0.00000 4 0.00001 5 0.00004 6 0.00022 7 0.00102 8 0.00386 9 0.01201 10 0.03082 11 0.06537 : : . 17 0.07160 18 0.02785 19 0.00684 ...
Seite 730
... involved with that project ) , there are also papers dealing with India , Latin America , the Philippines , and the three countries ( Indo- nesia , India , and Israel ) covered in the Inter- national Research Project on Language ...
... involved with that project ) , there are also papers dealing with India , Latin America , the Philippines , and the three countries ( Indo- nesia , India , and Israel ) covered in the Inter- national Research Project on Language ...
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York