Language, Band 53,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1977 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 56
Seite 545
... distinction between these two types of sentence ( any further discussion of which is beyond the scope of this paper ) , I cannot agree that the distinction lies in the fact that ( e ) is identifying and ( d ) is not . This may simply ...
... distinction between these two types of sentence ( any further discussion of which is beyond the scope of this paper ) , I cannot agree that the distinction lies in the fact that ( e ) is identifying and ( d ) is not . This may simply ...
Seite 743
... distinction between auxiliaries and main verbs . Certain rules seem to apply to both auxiliaries and main verbs . For example , Affix Hopping , which accounts for certain well - known discontinuities in the verbal system of English ...
... distinction between auxiliaries and main verbs . Certain rules seem to apply to both auxiliaries and main verbs . For example , Affix Hopping , which accounts for certain well - known discontinuities in the verbal system of English ...
Seite 862
... distinction as Laver , and describes consonants as ' either strongly articulated ( fortis ) or weakly articulated ( lenis ) ' ( 1973 : 54 ) . In Yekhee , Ghotuo , and Okpamheri , the distinction is reported for stops , nasals , and ...
... distinction as Laver , and describes consonants as ' either strongly articulated ( fortis ) or weakly articulated ( lenis ) ' ( 1973 : 54 ) . In Yekhee , Ghotuo , and Okpamheri , the distinction is reported for stops , nasals , and ...
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York