Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 60
Seite 545
However , attempts to associate the distinction with different derivations and with different syntactic properties have confused the question considerably . I will assume here that ID and AT sentences are associated with different ...
However , attempts to associate the distinction with different derivations and with different syntactic properties have confused the question considerably . I will assume here that ID and AT sentences are associated with different ...
Seite 743
A number of cases present an immediate challenge to the resulting rigid category distinction between auxiliaries and main verbs . Certain rules seem to apply to both auxiliaries and main verbs . For example , Affix Hopping , which ...
A number of cases present an immediate challenge to the resulting rigid category distinction between auxiliaries and main verbs . Certain rules seem to apply to both auxiliaries and main verbs . For example , Affix Hopping , which ...
Seite 862
He observes the same distinction as Laver , and describes consonants as ' either strongly articulated ( fortis ) or weakly articulated ( lenis ) ' ( 1973 : 54 ) . In Yękhee , Ghotuș , and Qkpamheri , the distinction is reported for ...
He observes the same distinction as Laver , and describes consonants as ' either strongly articulated ( fortis ) or weakly articulated ( lenis ) ' ( 1973 : 54 ) . In Yękhee , Ghotuș , and Qkpamheri , the distinction is reported for ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwighi Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from ? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important indicate interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels