Language, Band 53,Ausgaben 3-4George Melville Bolling, Bernard Bloch Linguistic Society of America, 1977 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 29
Seite 530
... acceptable.R We get similar results in contexts involving some notion of measure ; here non- cardinals are not allowed ( and consequently RR's are not , either ) , but cardinal quantifiers and AR's are quite acceptable . A few examples ...
... acceptable.R We get similar results in contexts involving some notion of measure ; here non- cardinals are not allowed ( and consequently RR's are not , either ) , but cardinal quantifiers and AR's are quite acceptable . A few examples ...
Seite 532
... acceptable . In 38b , a non - cardinal would be present , and consequently the structure would be un- acceptable : ( 38b ' ) * Ted will see { most , all , etc. } X of Alice . This accounts for the pattern found in 38. In 39 , we can ...
... acceptable . In 38b , a non - cardinal would be present , and consequently the structure would be un- acceptable : ( 38b ' ) * Ted will see { most , all , etc. } X of Alice . This accounts for the pattern found in 38. In 39 , we can ...
Seite 533
... acceptable . This is why the sentences 39a - d are good , and why the relative clause MUST be present if a certain class of determiners appears - the Class I items . The same set of assumptions can also account for the ungrammaticality ...
... acceptable . This is why the sentences 39a - d are good , and why the relative clause MUST be present if a certain class of determiners appears - the Class I items . The same set of assumptions can also account for the ungrammaticality ...
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York