Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 83
Seite 634
There are verbs which lead to unacceptable results if they undergo just Raising , without subsequent application of Passive : ( 51 ) * Everyone said John to have stolen the pie . ( 52 ) John was said by everyone to have stolen the pie .
There are verbs which lead to unacceptable results if they undergo just Raising , without subsequent application of Passive : ( 51 ) * Everyone said John to have stolen the pie . ( 52 ) John was said by everyone to have stolen the pie .
Seite 637
I believe very much for John to have done that . b . * What I believe is for John to have done that . [ cf. want ] ( 72 ) If Pseudo - cleft and Passive are defined for NP or 5 , and not S , we will get these contrasts : a .
I believe very much for John to have done that . b . * What I believe is for John to have done that . [ cf. want ] ( 72 ) If Pseudo - cleft and Passive are defined for NP or 5 , and not S , we will get these contrasts : a .
Seite 900
An example is the object NP here : ( 3 ) John is looking for a unicorn . Such a sentence is normally considered ambiguous between a reading where there is a particular unicorn which John is looking for ( the specific or de - re reading ) ...
An example is the object NP here : ( 3 ) John is looking for a unicorn . Such a sentence is normally considered ambiguous between a reading where there is a particular unicorn which John is looking for ( the specific or de - re reading ) ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Another glance at main clause phenomena Dwight Bolinger | 511 |
Amount relatives Greg N Carlson | 520 |
Where do cleft sentences come from? Jeannette K Gundel | 543 |
Urheberrecht | |
13 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acceptable analysis appear apply argument assume assumptions auxiliary believe Chapter Chomsky claim clause complement compounds considered constructions contains context course deletion derived determiner discussion distinction elements English evidence example existence expression fact FIGURE formal French function give given grammar important interesting interpretation involved John language least lexical linguistic meaning mention Michigan modals nature noted noun object occur particular passive phonological position possible prediction present Press principle probability problem properties proposed question Raising reading reason reference relations relationship relative require result rules seems semantic sense sensei sentences significance similar single speakers specific speech stress structure suggests surface symbols syntactic syntax tense theory tion transformational underlying University verbs vowels York