How to Read the Constitution: Originalism, Constitutional Interpretation, and Judicial Power
Rowman & Littlefield, 1996 - 226 Seiten
Prominent constitutional scholar Christopher Wolfe challenges popular opinions by presenting an insightful and well-supported defense of originalist interpretations of the Constitution. He describes the traditional approach to constitutional interpretation and judicial review and then focuses his analysis on the due process clause, which has become the source of most modern constitutional law. Wolfe challenges the most influential defenders of judicial activism, including Laurence Tribe, Michael Dorf, Harry Wellington, and Mark Tushnet, and he persuasively explains the dire political consequences of taking the Constitution out of constitutional law.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
How to Read and Interpret the Constitution
The Original Meaning of the Due Process Clause
Between Scylla and Charybdis Powell and Berger on the Framers and Original Intention
How the Constitution Was Taken Out of Constitutional Law
The ResultOriented Adjudicators Guide to Constitutional Law I Laurence Tribe and Michael Dorf
The ResultOriented Adjudicators Guide to Constitutional Law II Harry Wellington
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
accept according ambiguous Amendment American apply approach argues argument authority Berger better Bill broad chapter cited clear common common law Congress consider constitutional interpretation constitutional law construction context convention course Court criticism critique debates decisions determined discussion document due process clause early emphasis equal especially established evidence example fact federal founders framers give given grounds guarantee historical important issue judges judicial review Justice kind language least legislative less liberal liberty limited Madison Marshall meaning morality nature necessary opinion original intent originalist particular perhaps political position possible Powell Powell's practice precedent principles protection question ratifying reading reason reference regarding rejected religion republican requires rules says seems sense simply sources specific statute suggests theory thought tion traditional Tushnet understanding understood University values weight Wellington
Alle Ergebnisse von Google Books »
The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial ...
Paul O. Carrese
Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2010