Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 89
Seite 77
The biclausal RN for 51 would show Ayşe as a FINAL 1 of the complement . If the condition on antecedents of kendi is stated on final terms , the biclausal analysis predicts that the chômeur of a no - revaluation union should be eligible ...
The biclausal RN for 51 would show Ayşe as a FINAL 1 of the complement . If the condition on antecedents of kendi is stated on final terms , the biclausal analysis predicts that the chômeur of a no - revaluation union should be eligible ...
Seite 82
+1 This RN is at odds with the Final 1 Law ( Perlmutter & Postal 1977 , 1983 ) : ( 66 ) FINAL 1 Law . If there is a ck stratum of b , and no ck + 1 stratum of b , we say that the Ck stratum is the ' final ' stratum of b .
+1 This RN is at odds with the Final 1 Law ( Perlmutter & Postal 1977 , 1983 ) : ( 66 ) FINAL 1 Law . If there is a ck stratum of b , and no ck + 1 stratum of b , we say that the Ck stratum is the ' final ' stratum of b .
Seite 686
Hooper & Terrell's main stress rule assigns stress to the final syllable of the stem . For most vowel - final words , the final vowel is outside the stem , as shown by its loss in derivation ( e.g. cuchára ' spoon ' , cucharíta ' little ...
Hooper & Terrell's main stress rule assigns stress to the final syllable of the stem . For most vowel - final words , the final vowel is outside the stem , as shown by its loss in derivation ( e.g. cuchára ' spoon ' , cucharíta ' little ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Publications received | 446 |
Word formation in a modular theory | 451 |
Lexical and syntactic causatives | 485 |
Urheberrecht | |
9 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
analysis appear apply approach argues argument assigned associated Cambridge causative claim clause communication compared compounds consider construction contains context contrast derived dialects discourse discussion distinction effect elements English evidence example expression fact FIGURE final formation function give given grammar head historical important initial interpretation involves John language lexical linguistic marked meaning morphological nature notes notion noun object occur particular patterns person phonological phrase position possible predict present Press preverbs principles problem produced pronoun properties proposed question receive reference relational relative represented result role rule semantic sentences similar speakers speech spoken stress structure suggests syllable syntactic syntax theory tone types union University verb volume vowel word writing written