Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian PaternalismYale University Press, 25.03.2014 - 195 Seiten Based on a series of pathbreaking lectures given at Yale University in 2012, this powerful, thought-provoking work by national best-selling author Cass R. Sunstein combines legal theory with behavioral economics to make a fresh argument about the legitimate scope of government, bearing on obesity, smoking, distracted driving, health care, food safety, and other highly volatile, high-profile public issues. Behavioral economists have established that people often make decisions that run counter to their best interests—producing what Sunstein describes as “behavioral market failures.” Sometimes we disregard the long term; sometimes we are unrealistically optimistic; sometimes we do not see what is in front of us. With this evidence in mind, Sunstein argues for a new form of paternalism, one that protects people against serious errors but also recognizes the risk of government overreaching and usually preserves freedom of choice. Against those who reject paternalism of any kind, Sunstein shows that “choice architecture”—government- |
Inhalt
Introduction | 1 |
occasions for Paternalism | 25 |
The Paternalists Toolbox | 51 |
three | 59 |
Paternalism and welfare | 87 |
four | 123 |
five | 143 |
The Lives we Save May Be our own | 163 |
acknowledgments | 187 |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
active choosing Affective Forecasting approaches architects autonomy availability heuristic behavioral economics behavioral market failures behaviorally informed believe Cass choice architecture choosers cigarettes cognitive consumers costs and benefits daily Grill daniel Kahneman decisions default rules disclosure discussion effect efforts emphasize empirical ends paternalism energy efficiency epistemic argument ernment errors example focus forms of paternalism freedom of choice fuel economy hard paternalism Harm Principle heuristic human important insofar involves John Stuart Mill judgments justified Kathy Casey kind libertarian paternalism lives go loss aversion mandate means paternalism ment Mill Mill’s nalism nudges objections to paternalism paternalistic Paul Slovic people's choices people’s ends perhaps problem produce promote public officials question reason relevant require response risks salience savings Sendhil Mullainathan serious Sharot smoke ciga social soft paternalism suggest Sunstein supra note System taxes texting while driving Thaler thin version tion unrealistic optimism welfarist objections
