Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution

Cover
OUP Oxford, 06.12.2007 - 592 Seiten
The idea that society, or civilisation, is predicated on the "state" is a projection of present-day political ideology into the past. Nothing akin to what we call the "state" existed before the 19th century: it is a recent invention and the assumption that it is timeless, necessary for society, is simply part of its legitimating myth. The development, over the past three millennia, of the political structures of western civilisation is shown here to have been a succession of individual, unrepeatable stages: what links them is not that every period re-enacts the "state" in a different guise - that is, re-enacts the same basic pattern - but that one period-specific pattern evolves into the next in a path-dependent process. Treating western civilisation as a single political system, the book charts systemic structural change from the origins of western civilisation in the pre-christian Greek world to about 1800, when the onset of industrialisation began to create the conditions in which the state as we know it could function. It explains structural change in terms of both the political ideas of each period and in terms of the material constraints and opportunities (e.g. ecological and technological factors) that impacted on those ideas and which constitute a major cause of change. However, although material factors are important, ultimately it is the ideas that count - and indeed the words with which they were communicated when they were current: since political structures only exist in people ́s heads, to understand past political structures it is imperative to deal with them literally on their own terms, to take those terms seriously. Relabelling or redefining political units (for example by calling them "states" or equating them with "states") when those who lived (in) them thought of them as something else entirely imposes a false uniformity on the past. The dead will not object because they cannot: this book tries to make their voices heard again, through the texts that they left but whose political terminology, and often whose finer points, are commonly ignored in an unconscious effort to make the past fit our standard state-centric political paradigm.
 

Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben

Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.

Inhalt

34 Political thinking of the respublica christiana
clvii
346 Dante Alighieri
ccxlv
347 Pierre Dubois
cclxviii
4Preindustrial Europe
ccxcvii
4252 Enea Silvio Piccolomini Frederic III of Habsburg and Maximilian of Habsburg
cdxlii
426 The crown as an imagined central power
cdlvi
43 Crown and state in the ancien régime
cdlx
44 The reality of late ancien régime society
dxv

2232 The road to monocracy
xx
23 Political community and supralocal rule in the prechristian GraecoRoman world
xxxi
24 The relations between autonomous actors and communities in Greek and Roman political thought
lxvi
25 Thukydídês
lxxxix
3The universal community of christendom
cxl
332 Latin christendom
xciv
443 Ancien régime kingdoms and comparable political unitsas precursors not prototypes of the modern state
dlxxv
444 Autonomous political actors in the ancien régime
dlxxxviii
5Conclusion
xxi
References
lii
Index
cv
Urheberrecht

Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen

Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen

Über den Autor (2007)

Andreas Osiander studied international relations, history, and economics at Tübingen University, at the Institut d ́Etudes Politiques de Paris ("Sciences Po") and at Oxford University, where he obtained his doctorate in 1992. Having held teaching and research posts at Oxford University, the Humboldt University, Berlin, and the University of Tilburg, he is currently lecturer in international relations at Leipzig University.

Bibliografische Informationen