« ZurückWeiter »
works*. The Daily JOURNAL, May 11, 1728, assures us,
“ He is below Tom Durfey in the drama; because (as that writer thinks) the Marriage-Hater Matched, and the Boarding School, are better than the What-d'ye call it;" which is not Mr. P's. but Mr. Gay's. Mr. Gildon assures us, in his, Neir Rehearsal, p. 48," that he was writing a play of the Lady Jane Gray;” but it afterwards proved to be Mr. Rowe's. We are assured by another, “ He wrote a pamphlet called Dr. Andrew Tripet;” which proved to be one Dr. Wagstaff's. Mr. Theobald assures, in Most of the 27th of April, “ That the treatise of the Profound is very dull, and that Mr. Pope is the author of it." The writer of Gulliveriana is of another opinion; and says, “ The whole, or greatest part, of the merit of this treatise must and can only be ascribed to Gulliver f.” [Here, gentle reader! cannot I but smile at the strange blindness and positiveness of men, knowing the said treatise to appertain to none other but to me, Martinus Scriblerus.]
We are assured, in Mist of June 3, “ That his own plays and farces would better have adorned the Dunciad than those of Mr. Theobald; for he had neither genius for tragedy nor comedy." Which, whether true or not, is not easy to judge, inasmuch as he had attempted neither; unless we will take it for granted, with Mr. Cibber, that his being once very angry at hearing a friend's play abused, was an infa lible proof the play was his own; the said Mr. Cibber thinking it impossible for a man to be inuch concerned for any but himself: “Now let any man judge (saith he) by this concern, who was the true mother of the child|]?”
Bur from all that has been said, the discerning reader will collect, that it little availed our author to have any candour, since, whey be declared he did not write for others, it was not credited; as little to • Character of Mr. Pope, p. 7.
6. Gulliyer, p. 336.
i Cibber's Letter to Mr. Pone, p. 19.
have any modesty, since, when he declined writing in any way himself, the presumption of others was imputed to him, If he singly enterprized one great work, he was taxed of boldness and madness to a prodigy* : it he took assistants in another, it was complained of, and represented as a great injury to the publict. The loftiest heroics, the lowest ballads, treatises against the state or church, satires on lords and ladies, raillery on wits and authors, squabbles with booksellers, or even full and trne accounts of monsters, poisons, and murders; of any hereof was. there nothing so good, nothing so had, which had not, at one or other season, been to him ascribed. If it bore no author's naine, then he lay concealed; if it did, he fathered it upon that author to be yet better concealed; if it resembled any of his styles, then was it evident; if it did not, then disguised hé it on set purpose. Yca, even direct oppositions in religion, principles, and politics, have equally been supposed in him inherent. Surely a most rare and singular character! of which let the reader make what he can.
Doubtless most commentators would hence take occasion to turn all to their author's advantage, and from the testimony of his very enemies, would affirm, that bis capacity was boundless as well as bis imagination; that he was a perfect master of all styles, and all arguments; and that there was in those times no other writer, in any kind, of any degree of excellence, save he himself. But as this is not our own sentiment, we shall determine on nothing; but leave thee, gentle reader, to steer thy judgment equally between various opinions, and to choose whether thou wilt incline to the testimonies of authors avowed, or of authors concealed; of those who kuew him, or of those who knew him not. P. . Barnet's Homerides, p. 1, of his Translation of the Iliad,
+ The London and Mist's Journals, on his undertaking the Odyssey.
OF THE POEM.
This poem, as it celebrateth the most grave and ancient of things, Chaos, Night, and Dulness, so is it of the most grave and ancient kind.
Homer (saith Aristotle) was the first who gave the form, and (saith Horace) who adapted the measure, to lieroic poesy. But even before this, may be rationally presumed, from what the ancients have left written, was a piece i by Homer, composed of like nature and matter with this of our poet; for of epic sort it appeareth to have been, yet of matter surely not unpleasant, witness what is reported of it by the learned Archbishop Eustathius, in Odyssey X. And accordingly Aris totle, in bis Poetic. chap. iv. doth further set forth, that as the Iliad and Odyssey gave an example to tragedy, so did this poem to comedy its first idea.
Froin these authors also it should seem that the hero, or chief personage of it, was no less obscure, and his understanding and sentiments no less quaint and strange (if indeed not more so), than any of the actors of our poem. Margites was the name of this personage, whom antiquity recordeth to have been Dunce the first; and surely, from what we hear him, not unworthy to be the root of so spreading a tree, and so numerous a posterity. The poem, therefore, celebrating him, was properly and absolutely a Dunciad; which, though now unhappily lost, yet is its nature sufficiently known by the infallible tokens aforesaid. And ihus it doth appear that the first Dunciat was the first epic poem, written by Homer himself, and anterior even to the Liad or Odyssey.
Now, forasmuch as our poet hath translated those two famous works of Homer which are yet left, he did conceive it in some sort his duty to imitate that also which was lost; and was therefore induced to bestow on it the same form which Homer's is re
ported to have had, namely, that of epic poem, with a title also framed after the ancient Greek mannner, to wit, that of Dunciad.
Wonderful it is that so few of the moderns bave been stimulated to attempt some Dunciad! since, in the opinion of the multitude, it might cust less pain and toil than an imitation of the greater epic. But possible it is also, that, on due reflection, the maker might find it easier to paint a Charlemagne, a Brute, or a Godfrey, with just pomp, and dignity heroic, than a Margites, a Codrus, or a Fleckno.
We shall next declare the occasion and the cause which moved our poet to this particular work. He lived in those days when (after Providence had permitted the invention of printing as a scourge for the sias of the learned) paper also became so cheap, and printers so numerous, that a deluge of authors covered the land; whereby not only the peace of the honest unwriting subject was daily molested, but unmerciful demands were made of his applause, yea of his money, by such as would neither earn the one nor deserve the other. At the same time the licence of the press was such, that it grew dangerous to refuse them either; for they would forthwith publish slanders unpunished, the authors being anonymous, and skulking under the wings of publishers, a set of men who never scrupled to vend either calumny or blasphemy, as long as the town would call for it.
Now our author, living in those times, did conceive it an endeavour well worthy an honest satirist, to dissuade the dull, and punish the wicked, the only way there was left. In that public-spirited view he laid the plan of this poem, as the greatest service he was capable (without much hurt, or being slain) to render bis dear country. First, taking things from their original, he considereth the causes creative of such anthors, namely, dulness and poverty; the one born with them, the other contracted by a neglect of their
• Vide Bossu, Du Poeme Epique, chap. viii,
proper talents, through self-conceit of greater abilities. This truth he wrappeth in an allegory *, (as the construction of epic poesy requireth), and feigns that one of these goddesses had taken up her abode with the other, and that they jointly inspired all such writers and such works f. He proceedeth to shew the qualities they bestow on these authors, and the effects they produce t; then the materials, or stock, with which they furnish them ll; and (abore all) that self-opinion g which causeth it to seem to themselves vastly greater than it is, and is the prime motive of their setting up in this sad and sorry merchandise. The great power of these goddesses acting in alliance (whereof as the one is the mother of industry, so is the other of plodding) was to be exemplified in some une great and remarkable action : and none could be more so than that which our poet hath chosen, viz. the restoration of the reign of Chaos and Night, by the ministry of Dulness their daughter, in the removal of her imperial seat from the city to the polite world; as the action of the Æneid is the restoration of the empire of Troy, by! the removal of the race frou thence to Latium. But as Homer singing only the wrath of Achilles, yet in. cludes in his poem the whole history of the Trojan war; in like manner our author hath drawn into this single action the whole history of Dulness and her children.
A person must next be fix'd upon to support this action. This phantom, in the poet's mind, must have a name He finds it to bem; and he becomes of course the hero of the poem.
The fable being thus, according to the best example, one and entire, as contained in the proposition, the machinery is a continued chain of allegories, setting forth the whole power, ministry, and empire • Bossu, chap. vii.
+ Book I. ver. 32, &c.
Bossu, chap. vii, viii.
I Ver. 45, 54.