Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

TAN.T. Euo. Rew ver. (Ames) 18:51

Phena.

AMERICA'S STANDARD EDITION.

THE

REVISED NEW TESTAMENT

FROM

THE AUTHORIZED ENGLISII EDITION,

WITH ALL THE

MARGINAL REFERENCES READINGS,

TOGETHER WITH

PREFACE, EMBRACING A HISTORY OF THE REVISION,

AND

READINGS PREFERRED BY THE AMERICAN COMMITTEE.

PHILADELPHIA AND NEW YORK:
WILLIAM T. AMIES,

1881.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

PRE FACE.

The English Version of the New Testament here presented to the reader is a Revision of the Translation published in the year of Our Lord 1611, and commonly known by the name of the Authorised Version.

That Translation was the work of many hands and of several generations. The foundation was laid by William Tyndale. His translation of the New Testament was the true primary Version. The Versions that followed were either substantially reproductions of 'Tyndale's translation in its final shape, or revisions of Versions that had been themselves almost entirely based on it. Three successive stages may be recognised in this continuous work of authoritative revision: first, the publication of the Great Bible of 1539-41 in the reign of Henry VIII; next, the publication of the Bishops' Bible of 1568 and 1572 in the reign of Elizabeth ; and lastly, the publication of the King's Bible of 161 in the reign of James I. Besides these, the Genevan Version of 1560, itself founded on Tyndale's Translation, must here be named ; which, though not put forth by authority, was widely circulated in this country, and largely used by King James' Translators. Thus the form in which the English New Testament has now been read for 270 years was the result of various revisions made between 1525 and 1611 ; and the present Revision is an attempt, after a long interval, to follow the example set by a succession of honoured predecessors.

I. Of the many points of interest connected with the Translation of 1611, two require special notice; first, the Greek Text which it appears to have represented; and secondly, the character of the Translation itself.

1. With regard to the Greek Text, it would appear that, if to some extent the Translators exercised an independent judgement, it was mainly in choosing amongst readings contained in the principal editions of the Greek Text that had appeared in the sixteenth century. Wherever they seem to have followed a reading which is not found in any of those editions, their rendering may probably be traced to the Latin Vulgate. Their chief guides appear to have been the later editions of Stephanus and of Beza, and also, to a certain extent, the Complutensian Polyglott. All these were founded for the most part on manuscripts of late date, few in number, and used with little critical skill. But in those days it could hardly have been otherwise. Nearly all the more ancient of the documentary authorities have become known only within the last two

(i)

« ZurückWeiter »