Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and ProceduresPraeger, 1980 - 258 Seiten |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 45
Seite 102
... questions cannot be answered properly in this report but they deserve an answer ; we need to know whether theory and the results of basic research control application , whether application proceeds independently , or whether , in fact ...
... questions cannot be answered properly in this report but they deserve an answer ; we need to know whether theory and the results of basic research control application , whether application proceeds independently , or whether , in fact ...
Seite 163
... questions of value , giving less attention to knowledge questions . For example , in their pioneering work , von Neumann and Morgenstern ( 1947 ) simply assume the objective probabilities are known and then produce an axiomatic theory ...
... questions of value , giving less attention to knowledge questions . For example , in their pioneering work , von Neumann and Morgenstern ( 1947 ) simply assume the objective probabilities are known and then produce an axiomatic theory ...
Seite 178
... Questions put to decision makers are of the sort , " What's important ? " , " Why is it important ? " , " What else is important ? " , etc. The next step is the location of identified objectives within a hierarchical structure . The ...
... Questions put to decision makers are of the sort , " What's important ? " , " Why is it important ? " , " What else is important ? " , etc. The next step is the location of identified objectives within a hierarchical structure . The ...
Inhalt
THEORY | 6 |
Introduction to Theory | 17 |
Scope | 31 |
Urheberrecht | |
16 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
aggregation aids alternatives analysis appears applied asked attributes basic behavior Brunswik causal Chapter characteristics choice claims cognitive combinations common complex concepts concerned construction correct criterion cues decision maker DECISION THEORY decomposition defined described descriptive developed dimensions direct discussed distinction Edwards effects efforts empirical environment environmental evaluation example formal function given Group Group II approaches Hammond human idiographic important independence indicate individuals inference integration intended interest involving judges judgment and decision knowledge levels logical major means measurement methods multiple nomothetic noted objective observable optimality organizing principles persons possible preference present probability problem procedures processes psychological questions regard relative representativeness require respect response scale similar six approaches social specific statistical stimuli studies subjective task theoretical theorists Tversky uncertainty usually utility variables various weights