Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and ProceduresPraeger, 1980 - 258 Seiten |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 11
Seite 13
... merely because of its boldness , but because of its arrogance . For by asserting their premise - that human cognition can and should be studied by scientific methods - they imply that they expect not only to understand one of nature's ...
... merely because of its boldness , but because of its arrogance . For by asserting their premise - that human cognition can and should be studied by scientific methods - they imply that they expect not only to understand one of nature's ...
Seite 85
... merely the response of one system , as in the case with Group I theories ( including PDT ) and IIT . And this can also be shown to be the case for AT . 6.8.3 Integration of Group I and Group II Approaches There is one point of departure ...
... merely the response of one system , as in the case with Group I theories ( including PDT ) and IIT . And this can also be shown to be the case for AT . 6.8.3 Integration of Group I and Group II Approaches There is one point of departure ...
Seite 226
... merely as a criterion against which the results of descriptive basic research are contrasted . Instances of this category of organizing principles are found within the DT , BDT , PDT , and occasionally , IIT approaches . The second ...
... merely as a criterion against which the results of descriptive basic research are contrasted . Instances of this category of organizing principles are found within the DT , BDT , PDT , and occasionally , IIT approaches . The second ...
Inhalt
THEORY | 6 |
Introduction to Theory | 17 |
Scope | 31 |
Urheberrecht | |
16 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
aggregation aids alternatives analysis appears applied asked attributes basic behavior Brunswik causal Chapter characteristics choice claims cognitive combinations common complex concepts concerned construction correct criterion cues decision maker DECISION THEORY decomposition defined described descriptive developed dimensions direct discussed distinction Edwards effects efforts empirical environment environmental evaluation example formal function given Group Group II approaches Hammond human idiographic important independence indicate individuals inference integration intended interest involving judges judgment and decision knowledge levels logical major means measurement methods multiple nomothetic noted objective observable optimality organizing principles persons possible preference present probability problem procedures processes psychological questions regard relative representativeness require respect response scale similar six approaches social specific statistical stimuli studies subjective task theoretical theorists Tversky uncertainty usually utility variables various weights