Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 61
Seite 36
when one speaks of a passive transformation as having the complement S as its domain of application in 3a and as applying to three different domains ( indicated by brackets ) in 3b . ( 3 ) a . Alice thinks [ her son has been kidnapped ] ...
when one speaks of a passive transformation as having the complement S as its domain of application in 3a and as applying to three different domains ( indicated by brackets ) in 3b . ( 3 ) a . Alice thinks [ her son has been kidnapped ] ...
Seite 37
If the deep structure were Katz & Postal's 4b , ISD would have the same domain as any other transformation that involved the NP and the V ' , and accordingly the interactions between ISD and those transformations would come under the ...
If the deep structure were Katz & Postal's 4b , ISD would have the same domain as any other transformation that involved the NP and the V ' , and accordingly the interactions between ISD and those transformations would come under the ...
Seite 48
With the deep structure 23a , Q'L will apply with S1 as domain , and both some → any and the rules relating to the placement of not will apply with So as domain , yielding 24a , whose meaning is in fact 23a . ( 24 ) a .
With the deep structure 23a , Q'L will apply with S1 as domain , and both some → any and the rules relating to the placement of not will apply with So as domain , yielding 24a , whose meaning is in fact 23a . ( 24 ) a .
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Why surface syntactic structure reflects logical | 34 |
Quantifier scope in English Chinese | 63 |
Book Notices see back cover | 173 |
Urheberrecht | |
2 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acquisition ambiguous analysis appear apply approach argues argument aspects assigned Cambridge chapter Chinese claim clause complement complex consider constituent construction contains context creole definite dependencies detailed dialects discourse discussion distinction domain element English Evenki evidence example expression fact filler French function further German given gives grammar grammaticalization head historical interest interpretation involved issues John language lexical linguistic meaning notes noun object occur Oroqen patterns phonological phrase pidgin position possessive possible predicts present Press principle problem processing pronouns proposed provides quantifier question reading reference relations relative represent requirement role scope semantic sentences similar social speakers speech structure suggests syntactic syntax theory tion topics Tungusic University valence variation variety verb volume