Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 66
Seite 19
In order to account for these kinds of interpretative differences , some pitchaccenting accounts make rather complex distinctions between “ focus'- and ' newness'marking accents ( e.g. see discussion of Selkirk 1995 in Büring 2006 ) ...
In order to account for these kinds of interpretative differences , some pitchaccenting accounts make rather complex distinctions between “ focus'- and ' newness'marking accents ( e.g. see discussion of Selkirk 1995 in Büring 2006 ) ...
Seite 20
and Swerts ( 2001 ) claim further that there is no categorical distinction between contrastive and noncontrastive accents ( see also Braun 2006 ) . Lastly , the L + H * / H * distinction cannot be made reliably by annotators ( Pitrelli ...
and Swerts ( 2001 ) claim further that there is no categorical distinction between contrastive and noncontrastive accents ( see also Braun 2006 ) . Lastly , the L + H * / H * distinction cannot be made reliably by annotators ( Pitrelli ...
Seite 420
The distinction between the two classes of intransitive verbs in Georgian is indeed neither between “ stative ' vs. ... the most important semantic parameter underlying the distinction between the so - called ' intransitive proper'and ...
The distinction between the two classes of intransitive verbs in Georgian is indeed neither between “ stative ' vs. ... the most important semantic parameter underlying the distinction between the so - called ' intransitive proper'and ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
Phonological movement in Classical Greek Brian Agbayani Chris Golston | 133 |
Processing dative constructions in American | 168 |
Reviews see back cover | 214 |
Urheberrecht | |
2 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
accent addressee agreement alternative analysis appear approach argue argument associative auxiliary Cambridge chapter claim clause cognitive Colloquial French complement complex constraints constructions context contrast corpus dative definite dependencies derived discussion distinction doubling effect elements English evidence example expected experiment explain F-marking fact focus French fronted function further given grammar head indicate interpretation inversion involve island John language lexical linguistic locative marking meaning morphology movement moves nature noted noun object observed Oxford particular patterns person phonological phrase plural position possible predicted present processing prominence pronouns properties proposed prosodic question reading reference relative requires rules semantic sentence speakers specific speech structure subject clitics suggest syntactic syntax theme theory tion University University Press verb