 ... out of the employment. But it excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Seite 92von Michigan. Supreme Court, George C. Gibbs, Randolph Manning, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, William Jennison, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Dudley Fuller, Hovey K. Clarke, John Adams Brooks, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell - 1916Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1916 - 848 Seiten
...the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be 88 AT. JL Hulley v. Moosbrugger. peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. It must be... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1918 - 720 Seiten
...injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been...incidental to the character of the business and not imlepend- . ent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | 1921 - 510 Seiten
...said to arise out of, and be incident to, the employment. The rule adopted by some of the courts that, "the causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood/' is therefore not strictly correct. Acts Personal to the Employee — Injunemay arise out of the employment,... | |
 | 1920 - 1156 Seiten
...which th« workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative Jauger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the...be incidental to the character of the business and cot independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | 1918 - 1228 Seiten
...different language, In Ютbol v. Industrial Accident Commission, supra, a part of the statement being: "The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood." When measured by the standards set down in these cases, it is not difficult to satisfactorily conclude... | |
 | Connecticut - 1917 - 1198 Seiten
...compensation. This case also lays down the principle that the hazard which gives rise to compensation must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. That the Act may benefit one doing something not in the strict line of his duty but incidental to his... | |
 | 1913 - 1314 Seiten
...the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment....the work and not common to the neighborhood. It must oe incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant.... | |
 | Massachusetts. Industrial Accident Board - 1914 - 948 Seiten
...between the conditions under which the work is required to be performed and the resulting injury. . . . The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. ... It need not to have been foreseen or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin... | |
 | Boston Herald. Bureau of Department Reports - 1915 - 566 Seiten
...injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment," does not arise out of the employment. But these words do not fairly describe what may have been found... | |
 | Massachusetts. Industrial Accident Board - 1916 - 870 Seiten
...-injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment" does not arise out of the employment. But these words do not fairly describe what may have been found... | |
| |
