Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 36
Seite 26
Chomsky 1981 treated PRO as a pronominal anaphorand therefore , by the ' PRO theorem ' , as always ungoverned . Bouchard and Sportiche have argued that PRO should be treated sometimes as an anaphor , governed but not Case - marked .
Chomsky 1981 treated PRO as a pronominal anaphorand therefore , by the ' PRO theorem ' , as always ungoverned . Bouchard and Sportiche have argued that PRO should be treated sometimes as an anaphor , governed but not Case - marked .
Seite 29
As noted above , we assume that PRO may be governed , and that a governed PRO acts like an anaphor and is bound in its ... So , in 16 , PRO is governed by tried and ate respectively ; and the governing category is the higher clause ...
As noted above , we assume that PRO may be governed , and that a governed PRO acts like an anaphor and is bound in its ... So , in 16 , PRO is governed by tried and ate respectively ; and the governing category is the higher clause ...
Seite 35
Another approach is to claim that INFLo , the head of a small clause , mustlike other empty categories — be properly governed at P [ honetic ) F [ orm ) ( see below ; and cf. Weinberg et al . 1987 ) . This would entail that small ...
Another approach is to claim that INFLo , the head of a small clause , mustlike other empty categories — be properly governed at P [ honetic ) F [ orm ) ( see below ; and cf. Weinberg et al . 1987 ) . This would entail that small ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
The lexicon Victoria A Fromkin 1 | 23 |
Nouns and verbs Ronald W Langacker | 53 |
Boys will be boys Anna Wierzbicka | 95 |
Urheberrecht | |
3 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
accepted analysis antecedent appear approach argues argument aspect assigned assume basic bounded claim clause cognitive complement concerned consider consistent construction contains continuity contrast derivational dialect discourse discussion distinction domain elements English examples expressions fact FIGURE formal function genitive given gives governed grammar important indicate interesting interpretation John kind language lexical linguistic marked meaning morphology nature nominal notes noun NP's object occur particular patterns phonology phrase position possible pragmatic predication present Press principles problem pronoun proposed question reading reference relation relative relevant representation requires rules seems semantic sentences shows situation social speakers specific speech structure suggests syntactic syntax theory topic University verbs volume vowel