 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1890 - 1032 Seiten
...was to cover future advances, and the transaction was purely and simply a loan from Bull to Strong. It is well settled in this state, as elsewhere, that...transactions, in the absence of a settlement of the accounts. But by the terms of this rule it does not apply where the transaction is not a partnership matter.... | |
 | 1894 - 1096 Seiten
...action was by the assignee of one partner against the firm. Bull v. Сое, 77 Cal. 54, 18 Рас. 808, was a suit by one partner against another to recover...the partners about partnership funds. Bates v. Lane, 02 Mich. I't2, 28 NW 753, was an action by one partner against another to recover a personal <1 bt... | |
 | Floyd Russell Mechem - 1905 - 1168 Seiten
...was to cover future advances; and the transaction was purely and simply a loan from Bull to Strong. It is well settled in this state as elsewhere, that...transactions, in the absence of a settlement of the accounts. But by the terms of this rule it does not apply where the transaction is not a partnership matter.... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 772 Seiten
...was to cover future advances, and the transaction was purely and simply a loan from Bull to Strong. It is well settled in this state, as elsewhere, that...transactions, in the absence of a settlement of the accounts. But by the terms of this rule it does not apply where the transaction is not a partnership matter.... | |
 | California. District Courts of Appeal - 1927 - 978 Seiten
...distinguished from a partnership transaction. Butt v. Coe, 77 Cal. 54 [11 Am. St. Rep. 235, 18 Pac. 80S], it is said: "It is well settled in this state, as...transactions, in the absence of a settlement of the accounts. But by the terms of this rule it does not apply where the transaction is not a partnership matter.... | |
 | 1894 - 1054 Seiten
...action was by the assignee of one partner against the firm. Bull v. Сое, 77 Cal. 54, 18 Рас. 808, was a suit by one partner against another to recover...the absence of a settlement of the accounts." This rulo meets any contention of the defendants that the other partners might have sued them on their contract... | |
 | 1927 - 964 Seiten
...distinguished from a partnership transaction. Bull v. Coe, 77 Cal. 54 [11 Am. St. Rep. 235, 18 Pac. 808], it is said: "It is well settled in this state, as...transactions, in the absence of a settlement of the accounts. But by the terms of this rule it does not apply where the transaction is not a partnership matter.... | |
 | 1914 - 938 Seiten
...no application. In Bull v. Coe, 11 Cal. 54, [11 Am. St. Rep. 235, 18 Pac. 808], it is said: "It is settled in this state, as elsewhere, that one partner cannot sue another upon a demand arising out of partnership transactions, in the absence of a settlement of accounts. But by the terms of this rule... | |
 | 1914 - 938 Seiten
...has no application. In BuU v. Coe, 77 Gal. 54, [11 Am. St. Rep. 235, 18 Pac. 808], it is said: "It is settled in this state, as elsewhere, that one partner cannot sue another upon a demand arising out of partnership transactions, in the absence of a settlement of accounts. But by the terms of this rule... | |
| |
It is well settled in this state, as elsewhere, that one partner cannot sue another upon a demand arising out of the partnership transactions, in the absence of a settlement of the accounts. But by the terms of this rule it does not apply where the transaction... 