The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of High-Level Nuclear WasteSpringer Science & Business Media, 28.02.2002 - 246 Seiten When did man discover nuclear waste? To answer this question, we first have to ask if nuclear waste really is something that could be called a scientific discovery, such as might deserve a Nobel Prize in physics. In early writings within nuclear energy research radioactive waste appears to be a neglected issue, a story never told. Nuclear waste first seems to appear when a public debate arose about public health risks of nuclear power in the late 1960s and early 70s. In nuclear physics, consensus was established at an early stage about the understanding of the splitting of uranium nuclei. The fission products were identified and their chains of disintegration and radioactivity soon were well established facts among the involved scientists, as was an awareness of the risks, for example the strong radioactivity of strontium and iodine, and the poisonous effects of plutonium. However, the by-products were never, either in part or in total, called or perceived as waste, just as fission by-products. How and where to dispose of the by-products were questions that were never asked by the pioneers of nuclear physics. |
Inhalt
Prologue | 1 |
A Critical Matter | 7 |
Analysing the Place of Matter | 8 |
Experts in Modern Societies | 11 |
Sweden Nuclear Power and Nuclear Waste | 13 |
MultiBarrier Agreements | 14 |
The Contested US Programme | 18 |
The Famous Swedish Programme | 20 |
Cultural Theory | 134 |
Conclusions | 137 |
Geologists Mapping Bedrock | 143 |
The First Investigations | 146 |
KBS Geological Investigations | 149 |
KBS Supplementary Investigation | 152 |
KBS 3 Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory and the SKB RD Programmes | 158 |
Geological Interpretations | 162 |
Comparing Siting Strategies | 22 |
Outline and Objectives | 24 |
Authors Position | 25 |
Constructing a Theoretical Framework | 29 |
Science and Political DecisionMaking | 31 |
The Construction of Controversies and Consensus | 38 |
The Dilemma of STS? | 43 |
The Discovery of Nuclear Waste | 49 |
The Early History of Radioactive Waste | 52 |
The Early Swedish Context | 56 |
The Role of Experts in the Early Swedish Nuclear Era | 60 |
The First Principles of Nuclear Waste Disposal | 65 |
The Achilles Heel of Nuclear Power | 68 |
Interpreting Absolute Safety | 75 |
A New Government and a New Act | 76 |
The Regulation of the Ringhals 3 Reactor | 78 |
The Review Process | 80 |
The Governments Interpretation of the Act | 84 |
The New Application | 88 |
The National Referendum as a Final Solution | 92 |
Science vs Policy in the Regulation of the Ringhals 3 Reactor | 94 |
Politicians Using Experts | 98 |
Conclusions | 103 |
No Particular Place to Go | 109 |
The KBS 3 Concept and Another New Act | 110 |
Two Strategies of Siting | 113 |
One Strategy of Siting? | 125 |
Explaining the Strategies | 126 |
Rationalism | 127 |
Networking Geologists | 165 |
Conclusions | 170 |
The Myth of Democracy | 175 |
Public Acceptance | 176 |
Corporatism | 178 |
Democracy in Theory | 179 |
Legislation Decision Making and Democracy | 183 |
Feasibility Democracy | 186 |
The Municipality of Malá | 189 |
Municipalities Hosting Nuclear Facilities | 191 |
The Municipality of Nyköping | 192 |
The Municipality of Östhammar | 194 |
The Municipality of Oskarshamn | 195 |
The Oskarshamn Youth Opinion | 198 |
The Municipalities of Tierp Hultsfred and Älvkarleby | 201 |
Feasible Democracy and Strategic Actions | 204 |
National Coordination | 206 |
SKBs Choice of Site Investigations | 208 |
The Myth of Democracy | 211 |
Conclusions | 214 |
Regulating Technological Systems | 221 |
Rocks and Marmalade | 222 |
The Myth of Science and the Myth of Democracy | 225 |
Science Technology and the Construction of Society | 226 |
Opening the Black Box of Swedish Nuclear Waste Management | 227 |
229 | |
243 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of ... G. Sundqvist Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2013 |
The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of ... G. Sundqvist Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2010 |
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
absolute safety acceptance According actors advisory group AKA Committee analyse application areas argued assessment barrier Centre Party Chapter citizens claimed construction controversies corporatism corporatistic crack zones culture debate decided decision decision-making process democracy discussion energy environmental experts Fälldin feasibility studies final disposal final repository final storage geologists Göteborg University groundwater HLNW repository Hultsfred important interpretation issue Jasanoff KBS project knowledge legislation Malå municipalities Nelkin Nuclear Power Inspectorate nuclear power plants nuclear waste management Nyköping opinion organizations Oskarshamn Östhammar participation political politicians possible proposed question R&D programme radiation radioactive radioactive waste referendum repository for HLNW reprocessing requirements Ringhals 3 reactor rock role S&TS science and policy scientific scientists selection process siting strategy SKB's social society spent fuel spent nuclear fuel Sternö Stipulation Act storage of nuclear Storuman suitable Sweden Swedish bedrock Swedish Geological Survey Swedish nuclear technical Thorbjörn Fälldin Tierp
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 238 - REFERENCES 1 . RD&D Programme 92, Treatment and final disposal of nuclear waste.
Verweise auf dieses Buch
Global Environment: Problems and Policies, Band 1 K. R. Gupta,Maria Anna Jankowska,Prasenjit Maiti Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2007 |